Instead, Obamacare was a progressive maneuver to increase
the size of government by controlling another 1/6 of the economy. This is the
main focus and goal of the Obama Administration and influences how he governs.
His administration is never concerned about unintended consequences. That is,
these programs will result in costs that are astronomical and unsustainable.
Quality of health care will diminish due to fewer providers, longer waits for
care and massive government regulations. Also, the number of those insured will
not significantly change since more Americans will be unemployed or no longer even
looking for work and more employers will not cover health care for their employees.
Additionally, the health care exchanges, originally meant to help the working
poor obtain health care, will be postponed. Even when these exchanges are
operational in several years, government involvement and control of these
exchanges will result in more costly care, by restricting access to care due to
fewer providers, and because of increased bureaucracy and regulations.
Let’s review the playbook of this administration’s methods
of how to govern using Obamacare as the example.
·
Sell the public on a concept based on hope, but
not based on any facts or history of success; therefore unrealistic
expectations. All Americans hope that everyone can have affordable healthcare
and that this will not adversely affect the quality of care, access to care,
and not bankrupt the country in the process. Of course
those hopes only occur in a fairy tale world. The Obama administration, along
with the mainstream media and many misinformed voters allow this hope to
materialize into law.· Pass the legislation by any means possible. Obamacare was not going to be passed when Massachusetts, a liberal state, elected a republican, Scott Brown, for Senator in November 2009 mainly as a referendum against Obamacare. But when one door closed, the Democrats circumvented the process of passing legislation in Congress by using reconciliation and allowing the Senate bill from 2009 to be voted on in March 2010; even though it should have returned to the house of Representatives for changes and approval prior to a final vote (especially when the revenue for the bill is considered a “tax”).
No comments:
Post a Comment